r99592 MediaWiki - Code Review archive

Repository:MediaWiki
Revision:< r99591‎ | r99592 | r99593 >
Date:23:00, 11 October 2011
Author:siebrand
Status:ok (Comments)
Tags:
Comment:
Add soon to be used group "Translation administrators".
Modified paths:
  • /trunk/extensions/WikimediaMessages/WikimediaMessages.i18n.php (modified) (history)

Diff [purge]

Index: trunk/extensions/WikimediaMessages/WikimediaMessages.i18n.php
——@@ -135,6 +135,12 @@
136136 'grouppage-Ombudsmen' => 'm:Ombudsman commission', # only translate this message to other languages if you have to change it
137137 'grouppage-Staff' => 'Foundation:Staff', # only translate this message to other languages if you have to change it
138138
 139+ # meta.wikimedia.org specific user group
 140+
 141+ 'group-translationadmin' => 'Translation administrators',
 142+ 'group-translationadmin-member' => '{{GENDER:$1|translation administrator}}',
 143+ 'grouppage-translationadmin' => '{{ns:project}}:Translation administrators', # only translate this message to other languages if you have to change it
 144+
139145 # mediawiki.org specific user group
140146
141147 'group-coder' => 'Coders',

Follow-up revisions

RevisionCommit summaryAuthorDate
r99594MFT r99592reedy23:04, 11 October 2011

Comments

#Comment by Nikerabbit (talk | contribs)   10:38, 12 October 2011

I thought we were going to use the translation coordinator term.

#Comment by Siebrand (talk | contribs)   10:41, 12 October 2011

That's what I thought too just after I committed it. "Translation administrator" does not seem inappropriate, though, so I think we should leave it to not have too much difference between role ID (translation admin) and role name (translation administrator).

#Comment by Nikerabbit (talk | contribs)   10:45, 12 October 2011

We have a quite many administrator already, this could potentially add to the confusion. Not going to fight over this anyway.

Status & tagging log