r100366 MediaWiki - Code Review archive

Repository:MediaWiki
Revision:< r100365‎ | r100366 | r100367 >
Date:19:26, 20 October 2011
Author:reedy
Status:ok (Comments)
Tags:
Comment:
Also bundle ConfirmEdit, Gadgets, Nuke, RenameUser and WikiEditor
Modified paths:
  • /trunk/tools/make-release/make-release (modified) (history)

Diff [purge]

Index: trunk/tools/make-release/make-release
——@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
208208 export(branch, package)
209209
210210 # Export extensions for inclusion
211 - extensions = ['ParserFunctions']
 211+ extensions = ['ConfirmEdit', 'Gadgets', 'Nuke', 'ParserFunctions', 'RenameUser', 'WikiEditor']
212212 for ext in extensions:
213213 exportExtension(branch, ext, package)
214214

Comments

#Comment by P858snake (talk | contribs)   08:25, 30 October 2011

Was/Where are the discussions about ConfirmEdit, Gadgets and Nuke?, Those all had little or no votes on the page that was setup to discussion this Possible_tarballs.

#Comment by MaxSem (talk | contribs)   10:53, 30 October 2011

/me seriously wonders why not Vector.

#Comment by Reedy (talk | contribs)   19:14, 30 October 2011

I didn't even know that page existed.

It was done against the list of open bugs for stuff that should be in core/included in tar ball

This can still be added to/removed from, it's not an issue

#Comment by P858snake (talk | contribs)   07:38, 3 November 2011

Also, Have these extensions where appropriate been checked for their DB support for anything other than MySQL?

#Comment by Reedy (talk | contribs)   14:23, 3 November 2011

No, none of them add any new database tables

#Comment by P858snake (talk | contribs)   22:27, 3 November 2011

I know there is a bug open about Nuke and Portegsql, Rename user would need to interact with the DB...

Status & tagging log